A suggestion for the Largest Item Sink in Old-School RuneScape's History

I believe that it's a good idea but requires refinement: People would just move their items to be on the top end of that 10 percent, there by pushing the average OSRS Money price, rinse and repeat and the price of the item on that day will probably bloat very aggressively. If issue 1 is compared to players will inventory pile items and wait patiently to market on the day, as it is the cost and an payout can be manipulated. I think that there has to be a lockdown before it, about the purchase price of the item of the day.

Perhaps a different mechanic could be used, such as the thing of the afternoon is worth 1.1X it has average GE worth in gold should you fall it straight in the hole. In that instance it's 10% less costly on average to throw the items in for the pet. I assume this could be mistreated that the. Could address it by simply not telling us what item has been sunk. There is zero sensible reason for us knowing it besides to abuse it do not tell us. I am sure some folks might figure it out, but they would be imagining, and they could also switch up the thing to 2-3 objects rotating during the day or some number of solutions to deal with individuals abusing it.

It would be tough to identify through only blind guessing true, but this is precisely the kind of problem that basic machine learning is really good at tackling. Make it pick one of the top 5 things randomly. Good luck finding the top 5 and guess which arbitrary of the five it actually is. I meant like once a product is picked we'd know almost instantly, not beforehand (you could try to predict ahead of time but that may not be precise like you said).

How I read OP's layout there'll be a huge variety of those'sunken item' removed from the market after it is chosen. So this massive spike in item sells and/or associated rapid shift could be an alarm bell. Any marginally efficiently trained algorithm would be able to decide on these sink things up (presuming they were really having an influence on the current market, which if they aren't, then what is the purpose ). With the method I'm describing it would not be something you could predict beforehand but it would be something which you would know fairly fast after it happened.

More broadly, I'm just pointing out that its very tough to'conceal' an artificial constraint (at least one that produces an important effect ) on a market if there is sufficient data readily available on the industry. Demand curves and product prices are showing on stuff like that. There might be workarounds, such as obfuscating by having a list of things instead of just one which are randomly chosen or intentionally jumped around. If implemented word for word However, it would be a problem for the design of OP.

Make it an occurance that happens in the end of the ditch. If in the end 10billion is chucked then the correlating GE sales of the random unknown thing are subsequently bought out. No notification of it happening. No opportunity for abuse. Yeah thats not a bad idea. To minimize abuse potential even further I'd also suggest making the buyouts occur at random intervals - Best OSRS Gold site, to prevent people from only stockpiling random items and then posting them at 9.9percent over market place before the buyout occurs. So if the buyouts are arbitrary its still possible to do that, but you would be sacrificing all your GE slots to have items sitting there all of the time so that it would be more of a bet.

This would be really difficult to'hide' from players, since sink tems could be identified almost instantly via aggregated GE data. It would be pretty straightforward to come up with an automatic model to predict/identify them based on materials like cost swings and trade volume. And identification fully anticipate if that were to go live as indicated sites such as'getracker' would put in a tool in their front page suggesting these items.Why would you presume the items are being bought as the gp comes in or they simply would not reveal trades completed this way as a portion of the trading volume contemplating its not.