Let's look at the pros and cons of rental and built-in webhard


Let's consider the advantages and disadvantages of rental and built-in webhard.

Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This identifies a service that shares idc's server resources with other users.

Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.

The rental type has the advantage of having a server on idc, so it doesn't have to be managed separately, and the initial setting cost is low.

However, you must pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, purchase capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.

There are disadvantages such as dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) along with other domains.


Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to create services, freeing up capacity and traffic.

It gets the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies do not use rental solutions.Webhard is not only a Webhard, it's a company.

It is because it is confidential and knows the energy of strategic sharing and well-managed data.


Link hard solutions have emerged based on the intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without the burden.
It does not have to purchase H/W separately, and the perfect solution is alone allows users to create Webhard by utilizing the desired pc, NAS, and server equipment.
If you already had an internet site or intranet, it is possible to stop unnecessary work that used to run the site.

OK to create installed blogs or bulletin boards.

By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the company's homepage as well as the Webhard's original function, the idea of creating a use-oriented product makes one anticipate the expansion of the answer.

The price can be from 300,000 won for 30 people, which is often fully built in Soho, therefore the parts that have been agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will be solved a lot.


It is now necessary for Soho to establish a web hard system.

Rental vs. Construction.


Webhard reminds you of a very useful and convenient Online sites that allows one to download files on the internet at a set monthly cost. Because of this the application of web hard is becoming common.



But it's not just lately that this concept came out, and it's true that it is been a long time. The moment it came out, many people used it, and there were many office workers who didn't sign up for it or even paid for their personal expenses because of lack of capacity, and there are probably still some now.



The biggest background of this phenomenon is the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as for example work used, while there are many burdens and inconveniences to pay monthly expenses predicated on limited capacity. In addition, the service is provided against the backdrop of a large portal, which also leads to security concerns concerning the leakage of confidential information, which explains why the company refuses to adopt it.


In some cases, there are also many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet up with the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server consists of a server (HW)+ operating system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses using the number of users), that is prohibitive in comparison to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.



NAS supplies a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anybody with significantly reduce the needs of the webhard users. Webhard is very innovative since it supports uploading files automagically.p2p 's a really good feature because DDNS, etc. can be accessed from the outside and never have to buy an authorized IP.



Unfortunately, you can find functional limitations because the basic webhard included in these NAS is basic. As the word "basic" implies, it's not a webhard solution developed at a high cost. Subsequently, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Of course, it is a paid option, but it is a very low-cost, very useful solution that's significantly less than a tenth of the cost of building a single server.


Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low cost, creating a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll have a look at the rough top features of Webhard and guide you. It is possible to go over it and choose the best one according to the reality and needs.
41 Views