I personally think that there are always characters

You know, I think the fact that a developer was appointed to lead the company in the wake of Mike is gone, and the promotion of D2R Items to be the chief development officer speaks to more than just how important Blizzard principles are but is also an indication that Activision Blizzard understands what's important to Blizzard.

I absolutely love Diablo and have been obsessed with it in a way I've never been with any other Blizzard game. And I'm sure it's the same for many others. Making new IP definitely works for you, but you also have the classic games that people would like to see more of, such as StarCraft, like Diablo. What is your opinion on creating new versus leaning on the old? Do you plan to look into the older games like you've done with a classic game or is there still something to explore in StarCraft and as well as any other game that might come out?

I'm guessing that we're blessed to have now four giant IPs that include WarCraft, StarCraft, Diablo and Diablo. Also, there's Heroes which is a sort of a subset amalgamation of all the sorts of borrowings from the pieces of the IPs.

This is quite powerful. In reference to a previous question in which I talked about these IPs and their ability for several of them to provide different kinds of gaming This is something we're always going to look for.

I personally think that there are always characters, amazing stories to tell, and lots of games, and lots of game experiences that we can make with any of our IPs. I think there's plenty space and plenty of room for that. But I also think at the same time, you must think about something new also.

They are both important. Fans want the continuation of Buy D2R items Xbox games. I'm a big fan, and I also want to play more StarCraft games. Fans would like to see additional Diablo games. I'm a fan, I also want more Diablo games. Fans want new IP, me too.