The articles point out the nurses’ lack of knowledge regarding the use of urinary catheters as the problem at hand. The articles indicate that most nurses in practice are not familiar with medium-term, long-term and short-term use of urinary catheters. Additionally, the articles indicate that nurses lack knowledge regarding other ways of treating urinary incontinence; thus, they resort to the use of urinary catheters, which they do not understand the conditions attached to their use from essays masters review.
Almost all articles provide statistical evidence to indicate the gravity of the problem. Some articles indicate that most urinary tract infections in the aged population result from poor healthcare practice. By this, it is meant that nurses do not know the duration that they should allow the urinary catheter to stay in situ. Notably, short-term catheterization is the most confused and leads to urinary tract infection. The articles indicate that short-term catheterization should not exceed seven days, a point that most nurses overlook. Additionally, the articles opine that it has increased the financial costs of community care services because of the deaths occurring from urinary tract infection.
The articles consent to the fact that the morbidity rate associated with catheterization occurs because of bacteriuria. There are several risk factors associated with it and they include long-term indwelling catheter use, older age, patients with debilitating diseases like sclerosis and urological manipulations on patients. The mortality rate associated with urinary tract infections is linked to bacteriuria that results from more than a month catheterization with a 2.8 fold, which increases the mortality rate. The rate of occurrence of urinary tract infection is estimated at 0.5 percent of people aged 75 years and above because they are the ones who are catheterized for more than 28 days in most cases.
All the articles support the proposed change, although they have various opinions regarding the change. Continuing nursing education is cited as one of the ways to beat the problem associated with urinary tract infection and urinary catheters. Continuing nursing education is proposed because it keeps the nurses on a par with what they practice at work. Continuing nursing education abounds as a refresher course for nurses and the articles insist on ensuring that all nurses are privy to the content related to the topic before they are allowed to graduate. Secondly, the articles insist on the nurses’ practicing from time to time. Notably, nurses should be allowed time to practice on catheterization whether there is a patient needing the service or not. It is essential as it instills confidence on the nurses, which deals away with the chances of making a mistake when they are attending to a patient. Thirdly, the articles suggest the provision of medical libraries in health facilities. These medical libraries will facilitate nurses to do research on the topic and gain knowledge that will deal away with the associated problems of catheterization. For instance, some articles indicate that there are alternative ways of treating urinary incontinence rather than catheterization. Thus, when nurses are instructed to do further research from time to time, it will enable them to employ these other methods of treating urinary incontinence rather than employing catheterization. Some of the outlined methods of treating urinary incontinence include retraining the bladder so that it can hold urine and treating incontinence using anticholinergic drugs, such as oxybutynm and darifenacm. Nursing seminars also play a critical role in reducing the gravity of the problem as nurses are taught regarding long-term, short-term and medium-term catheterization. Thus, in order to deal away with urinary tract infection and poor healthcare practice, it is essential that all the above-mentioned solutions be adopted.
